What is the evidence?

observation

Radiocarbon and contextual evidence shows that cremation and inhumation could overlap rather than replacing one another in a single synchronized horizon.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1300 BCE–900 BCE

Precision: range

moderate

Preferred display range for this release. It preserves BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower samples, phase dates or alternatives listed separately.

Interpretation and caveats

Mortuary change should be modelled as regionally variable practice; it cannot alone diagnose migration or ethnic replacement.

Event context

Classification

Event type: mortuary change and coexistence

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event addresses required Cogotas classification and funerary-change topics across connected inland and northeast zones.

Research notes

  • Provides direct evidence for coexistence. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: pp. 549–559, radiocarbon model.
  • Provides central-Iberian classificatory context. Role: contextualizes. Locator: pp. 305–329.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records