Bronze Age World

Citation metadata

Type: peer-reviewed journal article
Publication: Trabajos de Prehistoria, vol. 71, no. 2, 305–329
Peer reviewed: Yes

Open DOI or stable record (opens in a new tab)

Records informed by this source

date assertion La Mancha and Meseta interaction frame — date assertion
informs · contextualizes · pp. 305–329
Defines the dated Meseta aggregation and Cogotas I debate.
relationship Research record — associated with
Evidence confidence: high
informs · contextualizes · pp. 305–329
Provides central-Iberian classificatory context.
relationship Research record — associated with
Evidence confidence: high
informs · contextualizes · pp. 305–329
Provides central-Iberian classificatory context.
relationship Research record — associated with
Evidence confidence: high
informs · contextualizes · pp. 305–329
Provides central-Iberian classificatory context.
date assertion Las Cogotas-related classifications — date assertion
informs · critiques interpretation · pp. 305–329, terminology and phase discussion
Supports chronological discipline for Cogotas I.
relationship Research record — associated with
Evidence confidence: high
informs · provides archaeological observation · pp. 305–329, 1450–1150 cal BCE model
Provides the chronology and aggregation interpretation.
date assertion Cogotas I classification — date assertion
informs · provides archaeological observation · pp. 305–329, 1450–1150 cal BCE reassessment
Provides a bounded phase model and interpretation.
relationship Research record — associated with
Evidence confidence: high
informs · provides archaeological observation · pp. 305–329, 1450–1150 cal BCE model
Provides the chronology and aggregation interpretation.
entity La Mancha and Meseta interaction frame
Evidence confidence: high
supports · contextualizes · pp. 305–329
Defines the dated Meseta aggregation and Cogotas I debate.
date assertion Coexistence of inhumation and cremation in later Bronze Age northeast and central-Iberian debates — date assertion
Evidence confidence: moderate
supports · contextualizes · pp. 305–329
Provides central-Iberian classificatory context.
event Coexistence of inhumation and cremation in later Bronze Age northeast and central-Iberian debates
Evidence confidence: high
supports · contextualizes · pp. 305–329
Provides central-Iberian classificatory context.
relationship Cogotas I classification — must be distinguished from — Las Cogotas-related classifications
Evidence confidence: very high
supports · critiques interpretation · pp. 305–329
Provides the bounded Cogotas I phase discussion.
entity Las Cogotas-related classifications
Evidence confidence: moderate
supports · critiques interpretation · pp. 305–329, terminology and phase discussion
Supports chronological discipline for Cogotas I.
date assertion Cogotas I hilltop aggregation and vessel-deposition practices — date assertion
Evidence confidence: low
supports · dates · See linked source chronology or phase model
Broader uses of Cogotas I can extend beyond the 1450–1150 cal BCE “full” phase and require regional subdivision.
property Archaeological label, not an ethnonym
Evidence confidence: high
supports · defines boundary · pp. 305–329, phase and practice reassessment
Provides a clear case of an archaeological classification requiring social caution.
causal hypothesis Cogotas I periodic aggregation model
Evidence confidence: high
supports · proposes interpretation · pp. 305–329
Provides the aggregation model.
entity Cogotas I classification
Evidence confidence: moderate
supports · provides archaeological observation · pp. 305–329, 1450–1150 cal BCE reassessment
Provides a bounded phase model and interpretation.
event Cogotas I hilltop aggregation and vessel-deposition practices
Evidence confidence: high
supports · provides archaeological observation · pp. 305–329, 1450–1150 cal BCE model
Provides the chronology and aggregation interpretation.
date assertion Cogotas I hilltop aggregation and vessel-deposition practices — date assertion
Evidence confidence: high
supports · provides archaeological observation · pp. 305–329, 1450–1150 cal BCE model
Provides the chronology and aggregation interpretation.
claim Cogotas I pottery and depositional practices cannot be equated automatically with an ethnic “Cogotas people.”
Evidence confidence: very high
supports · supports · pp. 305–329
Reassesses the archaeological phase and social practices.
claim The 1450–1150 cal BCE “full” Cogotas I phase should not erase broader or regionally different uses of the classification.
Evidence confidence: high
supports · supports · pp. 305–329
Provides the phase model.
property assignment Cogotas I classification — has evidence property — Archaeological label, not an ethnonym
Evidence confidence: very high
supports · supports assignment and caveat · pp. 305–329
The label organizes pottery and practices and must not be converted into an ethnicity.
property assignment Las Cogotas-related classifications — has evidence property — Archaeological label, not an ethnonym
Evidence confidence: high
supports · supports assignment and caveat · pp. 305–329
Chronological and classificatory differences must be retained.