What is the evidence?

observation

Some Atlantic-facing regions show hilltop, enclosed or aggregated settlements before the denser Iron Age castro record, but site chronologies and regional continuity remain uneven.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1100 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: range

low

Preferred display range for this release. It preserves BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower samples, phase dates or alternatives listed separately.

Interpretation and caveats

The pattern is retained as a cautious antecedent model rather than direct ethnic or institutional continuity.

Event context

Classification

Event type: settlement aggregation trend

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event addresses the required castro antecedent topic while explicitly preserving the evidence gap.

Research notes

  • Provides one strong fortified sequence. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: pp. 119–135.
  • Provides broader but lower-resolution context. Role: contextualizes. Locator: pp. 371–445, Iberian settlement comparisons.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records