What is the evidence?

observation

Sacred and public architecture was rebuilt and reorganized while metalworking and exchange continued.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1190 BCE–1050 BCE

Precision: approximate

very high

Preferred display range for this event. It preserves positive BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower contexts or alternative chronology models.

Interpretation and caveats

Investment in monumental institutions indicates transformed urban continuity, not simple post-destruction impoverishment.

Event context

Classification

Event type: monumental rebuilding and sanctuary development

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly reconstructs a Cypriot site, landscape, institution, community, or chronological transition within the primary interval.

Research notes

  • Documents continuity and rebuilding. Role: provides synthesis. Locator: Kition LC IIIA public architecture.
  • Connects the Late Cypriot and later urban phases. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Early Iron Age Kition sequence.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records