What is the evidence?

observation

Radiocarbon and assemblage studies define a final Bronze Age Bilozerka horizon north of the Black Sea.

The horizon is established; its internal chronology and relevance to adjacent systems are comparative rather than causal.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1200 BCE–900 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: release preferred synthesis

moderate

Preferred display range synthesized from the cited source roles. It preserves a range and does not imply every component occurred continuously or synchronously.

Interpretation and caveats

The horizon is included as a neighbouring comparator. No direct migration into the Caucasus is inferred from chronological overlap.

Event context

Classification

Event type: regional archaeological transition

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: cross regional context

Why it matters to the timeline

The north Pontic sequence materially improves interpretation of lower Don and post-Srubnaya change, but no direct causal or migratory link to the Caucasus is asserted.

Research notes

  • Provides the regional chronological framework. Role: dates. Locator: Radiocarbon chronology and periodization.
  • Places the horizon in broader steppe systems. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Pontic-Caspian comparative discussion.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records