What is the evidence?

observation

Regional monuments document a late phase of the Kayakent–Kharachoi archaeological tradition and transition toward Early Iron Age groupings.

The phase is supported in regional scholarship, but taxonomy and absolute dating remain uneven.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1400 BCE–900 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: release preferred synthesis

moderate

Preferred display range synthesized from the cited source roles. It preserves a range and does not imply every component occurred continuously or synchronously.

Interpretation and caveats

The phase is kept separate from Koban and Manas classifications and is not assigned an ethnicity.

Event context

Classification

Event type: archaeological culture phase

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event directly covers North Caucasian local traditions beyond Koban, as required by the comprehensive discovery rule.

Research notes

  • Defines the late phase and regional comparisons. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Monument catalogue and chronological conclusions.
  • Places eastern North Caucasian sequences in wider context. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Chapters 8–9.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records