What is the evidence?

observation

Mortuary, metalwork, settlement, and costume evidence marks the development of traditions conventionally grouped as Koban.

The broad emergence is accepted, but starting dates differ among regions and typological systems.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1400 BCE–1100 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: release preferred synthesis

moderate

Preferred display range synthesized from the cited source roles. It preserves a range and does not imply every component occurred continuously or synchronously.

Alternative assertion

1200 BCE–1000 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: later koban start model

moderate

Some regional schemes place recognizably Koban assemblages later than the broad 1400 BCE start. This remains separate from the preferred display range.

Interpretation and caveats

The event represents a broad and regionally uneven emergence, not the appearance of one ethnic people at a single date.

Event context

Classification

Event type: archaeological culture emergence

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

Koban chronology and early phases are a core North Caucasus priority.

Research notes

  • Provides the broad culture sequence. Role: dates and contextualizes. Locator: Chapter 9: Koban Culture, 1400–600 BCE.
  • Supports regional continuity and change. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Burial costume sequences and transition discussion.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records