What is the evidence?

observation

The earliest excavated phase established a fortified settlement within a wider Nakhchivan landscape near the end of the release interval.

The excavated phase is secure, while exact founding date and political affiliation remain approximate.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

900 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: release preferred synthesis

high

Preferred display range synthesized from the cited source roles. It preserves a range and does not imply every component occurred continuously or synchronously.

Interpretation and caveats

Local construction and material differences caution against identifying the phase as straightforward Urartian imperial occupation.

Event context

Classification

Event type: fortified settlement foundation

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The foundation anchors Nakhchivan at the 900–800 BCE boundary and helps distinguish local fortress development from Urartian expansion.

Research notes

  • Documents the earliest phase and differences from Urartian sites. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Early Iron Age levels, architecture, and comparative conclusions.
  • Places the site in its fortress landscape. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Oğlanqala settlement-system analysis.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records