What is the evidence?

observation

Large numbers of burials document sustained cemetery use, changing grave goods, and material connections through the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages.

Long-term use is secure, while phase-specific assemblage correlations require specialist review.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1500 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: release preferred synthesis

high

Preferred display range synthesized from the cited source roles. It preserves a range and does not imply every component occurred continuously or synchronously.

Interpretation and caveats

The sequence supports local continuity with changing networks. Later Urartian-type weapons must not be pulled backward before their dates.

Event context

Classification

Event type: long term cemetery use

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event supplies eastern Georgian/Kura continuity and cemetery evidence required by the coverage brief.

Research notes

  • Confirms the long sequence and later date of Urartian-type swords. Role: contextualizes and limits. Locator: Abstract and chronological discussion.
  • Places Samtavro within wider regional developments. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Southern Caucasian cemetery sequences.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records