What is the evidence?

observation

Graves contained bronze weapons, ornaments, vessels, limited iron, and styles compared with western Georgian and Koban assemblages.

The assemblage and broad dates are secure; cultural attribution and cross-regional mechanisms remain interpretive.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1200 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: release preferred synthesis

moderate

Preferred display range synthesized from the cited source roles. It preserves a range and does not imply every component occurred continuously or synchronously.

Interpretation and caveats

The similarities support interaction or shared technical and visual repertoires, not a fixed cultural or political boundary.

Event context

Classification

Event type: cemetery use and material exchange

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The cemetery links the North Caucasus, central Greater Caucasus, eastern Georgia, and Colchian comparison zones.

Research notes

  • Summarizes the cemetery sequence. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Site chronology, grave forms, and assemblage description.
  • Places Tli between Koban and Colchian research traditions. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Chapters 9–10.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records