Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: supported with major gaps. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Research assessment

statement

Changes in mining, maritime movement, scrap circulation and regional production reflect reconfigured networks rather than the complete disappearance of long-distance exchange.

proposed mechanism

declining or shifting copper sources; continued tin and copper movement through maritime and down-the-line exchange; greater recycling and episodic cargo loss or deposition

mechanisms

  • declining or shifting copper sources
  • continued tin and copper movement through maritime and down-the-line exchange
  • greater recycling and episodic cargo loss or deposition

chronology test

The model predicts continuity of contact alongside changing source signatures and nodes before and after 1200 BCE; Salcombe, Langdon Bay, British tin provenance and Frattesina/Huelva context are compatible.

geography test

The model predicts changing concentrations at coastal, riverine and craft nodes, with source-compatible metal and object distributions varying by corridor; it does not predict one fixed route or territorial trading system.

important caveat

The volume and frequency of trade remain unknown

Research description

The volume and frequency of trade remain unknown

Evidence and sources

Supporting sources

Contradicting sources

No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.

Other source context

No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.

Where to go next