Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Model comparison

question

What best explains Aegean-associated material and social change after the thirteenth century BCE?

ranking status

provisional_evidence_weighted_ranking

models

  • rank
    1
    model
    Mixed processes: mobility, exchange, local adoption, intermarriage, craft transfer, and selective identity construction
    assessment
    Best fits heterogeneous site histories and avoids treating pottery as a direct ethnic census.
    confidence
    high
  • rank
    2
    model
    Substantial migration concentrated in particular communities and episodes
    assessment
    Plausible at selected sites and in some household or mortuary changes, but requires case-specific bioarchaeological and contextual support.
    confidence
    moderate
  • rank
    3
    model
    Island-wide invasion or replacement inferred primarily from ceramic style
    assessment
    Does not explain continuity, local hybridization, asynchronous destruction, or the limits of ceramic ethnicity.
    confidence
    very_low

ranking basis

Material culture, architecture, foodways, funerary practice, inscriptions, isotope evidence, and settlement continuity are assessed separately.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next