ranked model · model_jerusalem_tenth_century
Tenth-century Jerusalem
Review and provenance
Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.
Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.
Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.
Model comparison
question
How large and politically capable was Jerusalem in the tenth century BCE?tests
- full stratigraphic publication
- secure short-lived radiocarbon contexts
- administrative objects with provenance
- regional settlement hierarchy
Evidence and sources
- informs · proposes interpretation
The Contribution of the Amarna Letters to the Debate on Jerusalem's Political Position in the Tenth Century BCE — Nadav Na'aman (1996)Larger model.
Locator: comparative capacity - informs · critiques interpretation
The Archaeology of the United Monarchy: An Alternative View — Israel Finkelstein (1998)Smaller model.
Locator: alternative view - informs · contextualizes
The United Monarchy: State of the Question — Zachary Thomas (2016)Balanced framing.
Locator: review
Referenced records
- Gradual development of the Judahite highland polity · event
- Early Iron Age development of Jerusalem · event
- Jerusalem · entity