secondary · src_ca_teufer_2021_vakhsh
The 'classical Vakhsh culture': a Bronze Age culture of the 3rd and early 2nd millennium in southern Tajikistan
Mike Teufer · 2021
Citation metadata
- Type
- book chapter
- Publication
- Routledge, 698-733
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
Records informed by this source
- entity Pamirs, Vakhsh and southern Tajik research frameEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · contextualizes · Regional setting and chronological synthesis
Defines the Vakhsh archaeological and geographic problem.
- entity Bishkent / Beshkent mortuary complexEvidence confidence: lowinforms · contextualizes · Regional mortuary chronology
Provides comparison with Vakhsh material.
- date assertion Pamirs, Vakhsh and southern Tajik research frame — date assertionEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · contextualizes · Regional setting and chronological synthesis
Defines the Vakhsh archaeological and geographic problem.
- date assertion Bishkent / Beshkent mortuary complex — date assertionEvidence confidence: lowinforms · contextualizes · Regional mortuary chronology
Provides comparison with Vakhsh material.
- geography assertion Pamirs, Vakhsh and southern Tajik research frame — geography assertionEvidence confidence: lowinforms · contextualizes · Regional setting and chronology
Supports the non-geometric spatial description.
- date assertion Classical Vakhsh culture — date assertionEvidence confidence: very lowinforms · critiques interpretation · Review of earlier chronology
Documents and revises the older placement.
- relationship Classical Vakhsh culture — not securely derived from — Andronovo-family classificationsEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · critiques interpretation · Chronology and comparative affinities
Provides the reassessment.
- entity Classical Vakhsh cultureEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · dates · Radiocarbon and ceramic reassessment
Supports the revised earlier chronology.
- date assertion Classical Vakhsh culture — date assertionEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · dates · Radiocarbon and ceramic reassessment
Supports the revised earlier chronology.
- claim Bishkent chronology remains unstable and older placement in a Fedorovo-to-Swat sequence is not secure.Evidence confidence: moderatesupports · contextualizes · Regional mortuary sequence
Provides comparative context.
- claim The preferred reassessment does not support classifying classical Vakhsh as an Andronovo-derived culture.Evidence confidence: moderatesupports · critiques interpretation · Chronology and comparative affinities
Provides the reassessment.
- claim Most classical Vakhsh material is earlier than the 1600-800 BCE core interval under the preferred reassessment.Evidence confidence: moderatesupports · dates · Revised chronology and conclusion
Provides the preferred earlier date range.