claim · claim_bishkent_chronology_unstable
Bishkent chronology remains unstable and older placement in a Fedorovo-to-Swat sequence is not secure.
Bishkent chronology remains unstable and older placement in a Fedorovo-to-Swat sequence is not secure.
Review and provenance
Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.
Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.
Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.
Evidence and sources
Supporting sources
- supports · critiques interpretation
Materials of the Early Tulkhar necropolis in the light of the hypothesis of Andronovo population migration to the south: problems of chronology — Svetlana V. Sotnikova (2024)Provides the principal challenge.
Locator: Chronological reassessment - supports · contextualizes
The 'classical Vakhsh culture': a Bronze Age culture of the 3rd and early 2nd millennium in southern Tajikistan — Mike Teufer (2021)Provides comparative context.
Locator: Regional mortuary sequence
Contradicting sources
No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.
Other source context
No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.