secondary · src_iberia1_legarra_2025_minimalist
Iberia and its relations with the Mediterranean in later Prehistory (4th–2nd millennium BCE). A minimalist revision
Borja Legarra Herrero · 2025
Citation metadata
- Type
- peer-reviewed journal article
- Publication
- Complutum, vol. 36, no. 2, 423–448
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
Records informed by this source
- date assertion Iberian Mediterranean coast interaction frame — date assertioninforms · contextualizes · pp. 423–448
Provides a critical review of claimed Mediterranean contacts.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides the evidentially minimalist review.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides the evidentially minimalist review.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides a check against overextended contact models.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides a check against overextended contact models.
- date assertion Iberian Pyrite Belt mineral landscape — date assertioninforms · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Cautions against converting resource potential into unsupported long-distance contact claims.
- date assertion Central Mediterranean metal and technology exchange model — date assertioninforms · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides a minimalist check on broader contact claims.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides a check against overextended contact models.
- entity Iberian Mediterranean coast interaction frameEvidence confidence: highsupports · contextualizes · pp. 423–448
Provides a critical review of claimed Mediterranean contacts.
- relationship Sant’Imbenia — contains material possibly sourced from — Iberian Pyrite Belt mineral landscapeEvidence confidence: moderatesupports · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Cautions against converting provenance into direct contact.
- property Modern analytical modelEvidence confidence: highsupports · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Demonstrates the need to distinguish models from direct evidence.
- event Possible Iberian metal signatures in late ninth- to eighth-century Sant’Imbenia assemblagesEvidence confidence: moderatesupports · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides a check against overextended contact models.
- date assertion Intermittent and often indirect Mediterranean exchange involving Iberian communities — date assertionEvidence confidence: lowsupports · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides the evidentially minimalist review.
- date assertion Possible Iberian metal signatures in late ninth- to eighth-century Sant’Imbenia assemblages — date assertionEvidence confidence: moderatesupports · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides a check against overextended contact models.
- entity Iberian Pyrite Belt mineral landscapeEvidence confidence: moderatesupports · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Cautions against converting resource potential into unsupported long-distance contact claims.
- entity Central Mediterranean metal and technology exchange modelEvidence confidence: moderatesupports · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides a minimalist check on broader contact claims.
- event Intermittent and often indirect Mediterranean exchange involving Iberian communitiesEvidence confidence: moderatesupports · critiques interpretation · pp. 423–448
Provides the evidentially minimalist review.
- date assertion Intermittent and often indirect Mediterranean exchange involving Iberian communities — date assertionEvidence confidence: moderatesupports · dates · See linked source chronology or phase model
A more conservative range for classes of securely Mediterranean-linked material.
- claim Before the ninth century BCE, many claimed Mediterranean connections with Iberia are better modelled as intermittent or indirect than as permanent colonies.Evidence confidence: moderatesupports · supports · pp. 423–448
Provides the minimalist evidential review.
- claim A Phoenician-associated object does not by itself prove a resident merchant, colony or direct eastern voyage.Evidence confidence: very highsupports · supports · pp. 423–448
Critiques overextended contact claims.