Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1400 BCE–900 BCE

Precision: approximate

  • informs · defines or contextualizes classification
    MĀRLIK — Kamyar Abdi (2000)
    Locator: Relevant chronology, regional synthesis, or assemblage discussion
  • informs · defines or contextualizes classification
    The Late Bronze and Early Iron Age in Northwestern Iran — Michael D. Danti (2013)
    Locator: Relevant chronology, regional synthesis, or assemblage discussion

Research description

It is not modeled as the capital or territory of a securely named kingdom.

Properties and assignments

A label’s definition and the evidence for assigning it here are separate.

Archaeological label, not an ethnicity
What does this label mean?

A modern archaeological classification based on material patterns rather than a secure ancient self-identified people.

Full property definition

Why does this record have this property?

The record groups material, chronological, or regional evidence. No assignment of language, ancestry, ancient self-designation, or modern national continuity follows from the label alone.

near certainStatus: proposed

Evidence and sources

  • contextualizes · defines or contextualizes classification
    MĀRLIK — Kamyar Abdi (2000)

    Source linked to entity record arch_srsc1_marlik_cemetery_horizon.


    Locator: Relevant chronology, regional synthesis, or assemblage discussion
  • contextualizes · defines or contextualizes classification
    The Late Bronze and Early Iron Age in Northwestern Iran — Michael D. Danti (2013)

    Source linked to entity record arch_srsc1_marlik_cemetery_horizon.


    Locator: Relevant chronology, regional synthesis, or assemblage discussion

Where to go next