claim · claim_srsc1_assyrian_campaigns_not_control
Assyrian campaign inscriptions attest military action and named lands but do not establish continuous administrative control across the northern highlands.
Assyrian campaign inscriptions attest military action and named lands but do not establish continuous administrative control across the northern highlands.
Review and provenance
Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.
Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.
Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.
Evidence and sources
Supporting sources
- supports · provides primary evidence and genre
Tiglath-pileser I 13 (RINAP/RIAO Q005938) — Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period / ORACCSource linked to claim record claim_srsc1_assyrian_campaigns_not_control.
Locator: Royal inscription - supports · provides primary evidence and genre
Shalmaneser III 040 (RIAO Q004645) — Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period / ORACCSource linked to claim record claim_srsc1_assyrian_campaigns_not_control.
Locator: Royal inscription
Contradicting sources
No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.
Other source context
- contextualizes · contextualizes
The Kingdom of Urartu — Yervand H. Grekyan (2023)Source linked to claim record claim_srsc1_assyrian_campaigns_not_control.
Locator: Assyria–Urartu relations