claim · claim_srsc1_karmir_berd_overlap
Karmir Berd should be represented as an overlapping regional and chronological tradition, not a clean successor state between Trialeti and Lchashen–Metsamor.
Karmir Berd should be represented as an overlapping regional and chronological tradition, not a clean successor state between Trialeti and Lchashen–Metsamor.
Review and provenance
Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.
Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.
Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.
Evidence and sources
Supporting sources
- supports · supports
On the Issues of Chronology and Periodisation of the Armenian Middle Bronze Age Archaeological Cultures — Pavel S. Avetisyan (2017)Source linked to claim record claim_srsc1_karmir_berd_overlap.
Locator: Karmirberd periodization
Contradicting sources
No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.
Other source context
- contextualizes · contextualizes
The Southern Caucasus in Prehistory: Stages of Cultural and Socioeconomic Development from the Eighth to the Second Millennium B.C. — K. Kh. Kushnareva (1997)Source linked to claim record claim_srsc1_karmir_berd_overlap.
Locator: Regional culture-history synthesis