What is the evidence?

observation

Lead-isotope and compositional analysis of 91 artefacts from 20 sites identifies different source compatibilities, including Iranian polymetallic and Tien Shan patterns.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1750 BCE–1400 BCE

Precision: range

moderate

Working range preserves source uncertainty and should be refined with site-level dates.

Interpretation and caveats

The results support multiple supply systems and object histories; Mushiston matches only part of the sample and no single route explains all bronze.

Event context

Classification

Event type: metal provenance pattern

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: cross regional context

Why it matters to the timeline

Object-level provenance directly connects oasis, Iranian and steppe metal systems while also limiting overextended tin-route claims.

Research notes

  • Provides the provenance patterns. Role: provides scientific evidence. Locator: 91 artefacts from 20 sites, isotope and composition results.
  • Provides geological and archaeological context. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Regional ore-source synthesis.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records