Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

2000 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: range

moderate

Working range preserves source uncertainty and should be refined with site-level dates.

  • informs · critiques interpretation
    Archaeology and language: the Indo-Iranians — C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (2002)

    Provides the core methodological caution against archaeological-language equivalence.


    Locator: Full article and responses

Research description

Evidence can support provenance, exchange, shared technology or individual mobility at different scales. No Vedic, Iranian or Indo-Aryan identity is assigned without independent linguistic or textual evidence.

Evidence and sources

  • informs · critiques interpretation
    Archaeology and language: the Indo-Iranians — C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (2002)

    Provides the core methodological caution against archaeological-language equivalence.


    Locator: Full article and responses

Where to go next

Referenced records