What is the evidence?

observation

Chicken remains at Mezber provide early evidence for a domesticate ultimately derived from South or Southeast Asia in the northern Horn.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

921 BCE–801 BCE

Precision: associated radiocarbon range

Chronology model: early Mezber chicken horizon

moderate

Associated charcoal dates bracket some early chicken remains to approximately 921–801 BCE; a directly dated specimen is later.

Interpretation and caveats

The presence is compatible with maritime or multi-stage transfer networks, but no single route, carrier population or direct Indian Ocean voyage is proven.

Event context

Classification

Event type: animal translocation and husbandry

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: cross regional context

Why it matters to the timeline

The biological transfer is outside purely local development and materially improves interpretation of possible Red Sea and Indian Ocean connectivity.

Research notes

  • Provides the chicken remains. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Faunal identification and Mezber contexts.
  • Provides the distinct dating evidence and cautions. Role: dates. Locator: Associated charcoal range 921–801 BCE and later direct date.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records