Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

800 BCE–400 BCE

Precision: range

Research description

Dʿmt is retained as a source-dependent polity label with contested date, scale and coherence. This release does not draw a unified territorial polygon or describe it as a South Arabian colony.

Properties and assignments

A label’s definition and the evidence for assigning it here are separate.

Chronology contested
What does this label mean?

Marks a record whose earliest date, phase boundaries or synchronisms remain materially disputed.

Full property definition

Why does this record have this property?

The name is attested, but the earliest date, territorial coherence and relationship to local sequences require competing models.

highStatus: proposed
Local agency foregrounded
What does this label mean?

Marks records where indigenous communities actively selected, adapted or negotiated external contacts.

Full property definition

Why does this record have this property?

South Arabian contact is real, but current evidence favors active local negotiation and diverse highland communities over a simple replacement model.

moderateStatus: proposed

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records