Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1150 BCE–900 BCE

Precision: approximate

  • informs · provides or interprets textual attestation
    Tiglath-pileser I 13 (RINAP/RIAO Q005938) — Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period / ORACC
    Locator: Relevant inscription, historical synthesis, or source criticism
  • informs · provides or interprets textual attestation
    The Kingdom of Urartu — Yervand H. Grekyan (2023)
    Locator: Relevant inscription, historical synthesis, or source criticism

Research description

Daiaeni is retained as an Assyrian textual entity. It is not automatically equated with ninth-century Urartian Diauehi or a fixed ethnic group.

Properties and assignments

A label’s definition and the evidence for assigning it here are separate.

External textual label
What does this label mean?

A name preserved in an outside power's texts rather than a securely attested self-designation.

Full property definition

Why does this record have this property?

The assignment identifies the naming perspective and genre. Geography, political scale, and any linguistic or ethnic attribution require separate evidence.

near certainStatus: proposed

Evidence and sources

  • supports · provides or interprets textual attestation
    Tiglath-pileser I 13 (RINAP/RIAO Q005938) — Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period / ORACC

    Source linked to entity record text_srsc1_daiaeni.


    Locator: Relevant inscription, historical synthesis, or source criticism
  • supports · provides or interprets textual attestation
    The Kingdom of Urartu — Yervand H. Grekyan (2023)

    Source linked to entity record text_srsc1_daiaeni.


    Locator: Relevant inscription, historical synthesis, or source criticism

Where to go next