What is the evidence?

observation

Bayesian modelling places the start of a Phoenician-associated Huelva settlement quarter within 906–827 BCE at the reported 68.2 per cent interval, most plausibly in the later ninth century.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

900 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: range

high

Preferred display range for this release. It preserves BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower samples, phase dates or alternatives listed separately.

Alternative assertion

906 BCE–827 BCE

Precision: modelled range

high

Published modelled start interval for the Phoenician-associated Huelva quarter.

Interpretation and caveats

The quarter is evidence for resident or repeated eastern Mediterranean-associated participation within an indigenous estuarine settlement, not proof that all Huelva became a colony at one instant.

Event context

Classification

Event type: settlement foundation and cross cultural interaction

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event is central to the required earliest-Phoenician and indigenous/colonial-interaction questions.

Alternative interpretations

  • The reported 68.2 per cent modelled start interval is 906–827 BCE; publication and calibration choices should be preserved when refined. (high confidence)

Research notes

  • Provides the modelled start range and archaeological context. Role: dates. Locator: pp. 1495–1510, Huelva Bayesian model.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records