Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Alternative assertion

1990 BCE–1700 BCE

Precision: range

low

Approximate activity or relevance range, not an assertion that the entity was unchanged throughout.

  • supports · supports site history
    Ancient Egyptian Chronology — Erik Hornung (editor), Rolf Krauss (editor), David A. Warburton (editor) (2006)

    Supports the place, phase and interpretive caution.


    Locator: Site or regional discussion

Research description

Middle Kingdom royal residence known textually but not securely located archaeologically. The site record is diachronic; individual phases and control relationships are represented separately.

Properties and assignments

A label’s definition and the evidence for assigning it here are separate.

Modern research reconstruction
What does this label mean?

A map, chronology or relationship assembled by modern scholarship from incomplete evidence.

Full property definition

Why does this record have this property?

The record exhibits this analytical property during the stated interval, with the linked source defining the evidence and limitations. The assignment is a modern classification and does not create an ancient event or permanent territorial identity.

moderateStatus: supported assignment

Evidence and sources

  • supports · supports site history
    Ancient Egyptian Chronology — Erik Hornung (editor), Rolf Krauss (editor), David A. Warburton (editor) (2006)

    Supports the place, phase and interpretive caution.


    Locator: Site or regional discussion

Where to go next

Referenced records