Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

860 BCE–600 BCE

Precision: approximate

Research description

The state emerges near the end of this release interval. Its later administrative and material assemblage must not be projected onto earlier Lchashen–Metsamor, Khojaly–Gadabay, Colchian, or Koban archaeology.

Evidence and sources

  • supports · provides or interprets textual attestation
    The Kingdom of Urartu — Yervand H. Grekyan (2023)

    Source linked to entity record pol_srsc1_urartu.


    Locator: Relevant inscription, historical synthesis, or source criticism
  • supports · provides or interprets textual attestation
    Urartian Material Culture as State Assemblage: An Anomaly in the Archaeology of Empire — Paul E. Zimansky (1995)

    Source linked to entity record pol_srsc1_urartu.


    Locator: Relevant inscription, historical synthesis, or source criticism
  • supports · provides or interprets textual attestation
    Urartian and the Urartians — Paul E. Zimansky (2012)

    Source linked to entity record pol_srsc1_urartu.


    Locator: Relevant inscription, historical synthesis, or source criticism

Where to go next